Opinion

Editor’s view - Give and Take

Editor’s View
Ofsted’s recent inspections seem to be overzealous at a time when many settings are struggling with factors beyond their control
Karen Faux
Karen Faux

Just as it seemed Ofsted was stepping out into the sunshine – with chief inspector Amanda Spielman’s stated recognition of the importance of play and a renewed focus on early years (speaking at NW’s Business Summit in March) – a big black cloud is back over its head.

Our analysis on page 6 on how nurseries have fared under recent inspections does not make happy reading. It supports what we have been hearing anecdotally, that many settings feel they have been unfairly downgraded, which is causing much stress and in some cases business closure.

It seems to be a highly stressful situation on both sides. Ofsted has had a huge backlog of inspections to shift since Covid restrictions lifted. Its catch-up operation has been targeted at new registrations, those judged ‘inadequate’ or Requires Improvement, and those with serious safeguarding concerns. The pressure has been on to establish that children are safe, and where setting staff don’t appear to know children as well as they should (not knowing their birthdays, for example?), Ofsted has been quite ruthless. But as our analysis highlights, these issues reflect the problems of an ongoing recruitment crisis and chronic underfunding – where providers are struggling in the most difficult of circumstances. Can Ofsted acknowledge this?

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here